EXG vs. NIHI
EXG (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund) and NIHI (NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF) are both funds - EXG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while NIHI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXG charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for NIHI.
Performance
EXG vs. NIHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly lower than NIHI's 6.39% return.
EXG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 3.99%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
NIHI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 6.39%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EXG vs. NIHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | 3.99% | 8.67% |
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 6.39% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXG and NIHI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXG vs. NIHI — Risk / Return Rank
EXG
NIHI
EXG vs. NIHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXG | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXG | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.17 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
EXG vs. NIHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than NIHI's maximum drawdown of -10.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and NIHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXG | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -10.88% | -47.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.63% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -2.39% | -7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | — | — |
Volatility
EXG vs. NIHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXG | NIHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 15.14% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 15.14% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 15.14% | +4.85% |
EXG vs. NIHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NIHI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXG vs. NIHI - Dividend Comparison
EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.24%, more than NIHI's 7.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | 8.24% | 8.27% | 9.27% | 8.60% | 10.59% | 7.27% | 8.43% | 8.42% | 12.23% | 9.84% | 12.16% | 11.02% |
NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF | 7.79% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXG and NIHI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EXG and NIHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer