EXG vs. FOF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EXG (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund) and FOF (Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - EXG is a Dividend fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while FOF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, EXG returned 10.39%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for FOF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EXG charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FOF.

Performance

EXG vs. FOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than FOF's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EXG has underperformed FOF with an annualized return of 10.39%, while FOF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.

EXG

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 6M: 7.01%
• 1Y: 19.37%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 7.69%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

FOF

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 8.91%
• 1Y: 21.82%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXG vs. FOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund	2.69%	27.79%	16.04%	11.46%	-22.24%	31.53%	10.19%	28.71%	-12.09%	29.58%
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund	8.19%	13.01%	23.65%	17.90%	-22.69%	28.24%	1.52%	31.37%	-9.43%	23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EXG and FOF is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007	0.58

The correlation between EXG and FOF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EXG vs. FOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXG

EXG Risk / Return Rank: 23
EXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
EXG Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
EXG Martin Ratio Rank: 25

FOF

FOF Risk / Return Rank: 25
FOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FOF Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FOF Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXG vs. FOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EXG	FOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.60	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.23	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	1.45	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.21	4.96	+1.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EXG vs. FOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the FOF Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXG and FOF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EXG	FOF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.47	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.54	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.33	-0.02

Drawdowns

EXG vs. FOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FOF drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and FOF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXG	FOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.45%	-59.38%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.28%	-15.07%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-18.58%	+3.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.82%	-29.96%	+2.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.36%	-49.74%	+4.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-5.53%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.62%	-9.35%	-0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	4.41%	-1.29%

Volatility

EXG vs. FOF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) is 4.35%, while Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that EXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXG	FOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	5.71%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	12.33%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	13.70%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	18.04%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	20.34%	-0.35%

EXG vs. FOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FOF's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXG vs. FOF - Dividend Comparison

EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than FOF's 7.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund	8.34%	8.27%	9.27%	8.60%	10.59%	7.27%	8.43%	8.42%	12.23%	9.84%	12.16%	11.02%
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund	7.54%	7.91%	8.22%	9.32%	9.99%	7.06%	8.41%	7.78%	9.41%	7.84%	8.90%	9.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXG and FOF in my portfolio?

EXG and FOF have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXG or FOF?

FOF has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to EXG (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXG dropped -58.45% vs FOF's -59.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.