EXG vs. CDDYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX).
EXG is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 27, 2007. CDDYX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2012.
Performance
EXG vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXG vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | -5.16% | 27.79% | 16.04% | 11.46% | -22.24% | 31.53% | 10.19% | 28.71% | -12.09% | 29.58% |
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 3.28% | 15.95% | 15.17% | 10.65% | -4.84% | 26.43% | 7.92% | 28.74% | -4.27% | 20.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a -5.16% return, which is significantly lower than CDDYX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EXG has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
EXG
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- -5.16%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 18.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
CDDYX
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXG vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXG vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank
EXG
CDDYX
EXG vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXG | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.75 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.27 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.78 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.81 | 8.25 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXG | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.82 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.86 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXG and CDDYX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EXG vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison
EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.91%, more than CDDYX's 5.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXG Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund | 8.91% | 8.27% | 9.27% | 8.60% | 10.59% | 7.27% | 8.43% | 8.42% | 12.23% | 9.84% | 12.16% | 11.02% |
CDDYX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class | 5.21% | 5.33% | 5.99% | 4.96% | 3.90% | 2.93% | 1.85% | 3.28% | 7.65% | 4.03% | 3.84% | 8.35% |
Drawdowns
EXG vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and CDDYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXG | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.45% | -32.74% | -25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -10.17% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.82% | -16.91% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -32.74% | -12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.37% | -3.95% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -2.79% | -6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.19% | +1.04% |
Volatility
EXG vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) at 3.45%. This indicates that EXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXG | CDDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 3.45% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 7.00% | +3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.36% | 13.67% | +4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 13.31% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 15.68% | +4.26% |