PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXG vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXG vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXG achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than AMECX's 6.34% return. Over the past 10 years, EXG has outperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 10.39%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


EXG

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.88%
YTD
2.69%
6M
7.01%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
10.39%

AMECX

1D
0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
6.34%
6M
7.37%
1Y
15.78%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
8.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXG vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
2.69%27.79%16.04%11.46%-22.24%31.53%10.19%28.71%-12.09%29.58%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
6.34%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EXG and AMECX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007

0.71

The correlation between EXG and AMECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXG vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXG
EXG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXG vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXGAMECXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

2.24

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

3.16

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.41

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.62

-1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

9.88

-3.66

EXG vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXG and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXGAMECXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.24

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.80

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.72

-0.41

Drawdowns

EXG vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXG drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than AMECX's maximum drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXG and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXGAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-41.92%

-16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-6.13%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-8.58%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.82%

-15.78%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-26.13%

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.23%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-4.45%

-5.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.62%

+1.50%

Volatility

EXG vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund (EXG) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) at 2.06%. This indicates that EXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXGAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

2.06%

+2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.97%

5.63%

+5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

7.17%

+6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

9.45%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

10.68%

+9.31%

EXG vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXG has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXG vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

EXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, less than AMECX's 9.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.41%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%
EXG
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
8.34%8.27%9.27%8.60%10.59%7.27%8.43%8.42%12.23%9.84%12.16%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXG and AMECX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXG has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to AMECX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXG dropped -58.45% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

AMECX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXG and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer