EXEYX vs. MCDWX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EXEYX (Manning & Napier Equity Series) and MCDWX (Manning & Napier Credit Series) are both mutual funds - EXEYX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Manning & Napier, while MCDWX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 5 years, EXEYX returned 7.09%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MCDWX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXEYX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for MCDWX.

Performance

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXEYX achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than MCDWX's 0.78% return.

EXEYX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: -0.21%
• 1Y: 10.59%
• 3Y*: 11.60%
• 5Y*: 7.09%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

MCDWX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 5.62%
• 5Y*: 1.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EXEYX Manning & Napier Equity Series	0.49%	8.77%	15.87%	24.52%	-19.51%	25.41%	39.13%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	0.78%	7.57%	4.13%	7.31%	-11.13%	0.01%	8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EXEYX and MCDWX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2020	0.19

The correlation between EXEYX and MCDWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EXEYX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXEYX

EXEYX Risk / Return Rank: 8
EXEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EXEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EXEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EXEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
EXEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

MCDWX

MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EXEYX	MCDWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	1.82	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	2.65	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.36	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.62	2.42	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.03	7.54	-5.51

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXEYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXEYX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXEYX drawdown since its inception was -54.49%, which is greater than MCDWX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXEYX and MCDWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXEYX	MCDWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.49%	-15.96%	-38.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-2.17%	-14.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.43%	-4.22%	-16.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.62%	-15.96%	-9.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-0.73%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.85%	-4.12%	-3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	0.69%	+4.26%

Volatility

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Equity Series (EXEYX) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) at 0.95%. This indicates that EXEYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXEYX	MCDWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	0.95%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	2.24%	+8.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	2.89%	+11.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	4.63%	+12.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	4.37%	+13.60%

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXEYX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXEYX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

EXEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, more than MCDWX's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXEYX Manning & Napier Equity Series	11.21%	11.26%	11.88%	3.11%	13.28%	16.60%	8.31%	10.39%	20.49%	7.57%	4.98%	44.53%
MCDWX Manning & Napier Credit Series	4.46%	4.83%	4.41%	4.48%	3.25%	4.45%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXEYX and MCDWX in my portfolio?

EXEYX and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXEYX or MCDWX?

EXEYX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to MCDWX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXEYX dropped -54.49% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.