EXCRX vs. UMMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX).
EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005. UMMGX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 9, 1986.
Performance
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 0.03% | 8.03% | 2.06% | 6.73% | -15.66% | -0.79% | 9.10% | 9.23% | -0.50% | 3.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly lower than UMMGX's 0.03% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed UMMGX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while UMMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.07% annualized return.
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
UMMGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.12%
- 10Y*
- 2.07%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXCRX vs. UMMGX — Risk / Return Rank
EXCRX
UMMGX
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXCRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.31 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.95 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.09 | -0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 6.63 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXCRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.31 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.40 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.94 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXCRX and UMMGX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Dividend Comparison
EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than UMMGX's 4.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
UMMGX Columbia Bond Fund | 4.08% | 4.20% | 3.70% | 3.73% | 2.73% | 1.76% | 4.77% | 4.21% | 2.71% | 1.88% | 4.66% | 3.56% |
Drawdowns
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum UMMGX drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and UMMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXCRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -20.86% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -2.76% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -20.86% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | -20.86% | +2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -2.58% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -2.73% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 0.87% | +0.24% |
Volatility
EXCRX vs. UMMGX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Columbia Bond Fund (UMMGX) at 1.05%. This indicates that EXCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXCRX | UMMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.05% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.35% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 4.43% | +0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 6.31% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 5.18% | -0.35% |