EXCRX vs. FMBPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX).
EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005. FMBPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | -0.06% | 9.03% | 1.04% | 4.44% | -12.21% | -1.35% | 4.77% | 6.30% | 1.13% | 2.76% |
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with EXCRX at -0.06% and FMBPX at -0.06%. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has outperformed FMBPX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while FMBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.46% annualized return.
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
FMBPX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.21%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FMBPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXCRX vs. FMBPX — Risk / Return Rank
EXCRX
FMBPX
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXCRX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.56 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.22 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.19 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 6.03 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXCRX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.03 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.29 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.25 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXCRX and FMBPX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Dividend Comparison
EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than FMBPX's 4.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
FMBPX Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio | 4.59% | 4.87% | 4.29% | 3.46% | 2.29% | 1.96% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FMBPX drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and FMBPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXCRX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -18.34% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -3.15% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -18.02% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | -18.34% | -0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -2.08% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -3.28% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 1.14% | -0.03% |
Volatility
EXCRX vs. FMBPX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Federated Hermes Mortgage Strategy Portfolio (FMBPX) at 1.50%. This indicates that EXCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXCRX | FMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.50% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 3.02% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 5.43% | -0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 6.72% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 5.08% | -0.25% |