PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXCPX vs. ATCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) and Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund (ATCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXCPX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than ATCSX's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCPX has outperformed ATCSX with an annualized return of 2.99%, while ATCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.63% annualized return.


EXCPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
2.99%

ATCSX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.20%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.26%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EXCPX
Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series
1.02%6.17%4.09%6.00%-6.71%2.58%7.54%5.01%0.20%3.19%
ATCSX
Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund
4.38%3.71%4.25%-2.23%-6.60%-0.21%11.02%5.14%-4.18%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EXCPX and ATCSX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXCPX vs. ATCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXCPX
EXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ATCSX
ATCSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ATCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ATCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) and Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund (ATCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXCPXATCSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

1.99

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.70

+0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.68

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.30

11.24

+1.07

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXCPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the ATCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXCPX and ATCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXCPXATCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.99

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.01

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.25

0.05

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.05

+1.16

Drawdowns

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXCPX drawdown since its inception was -9.65%, smaller than the maximum ATCSX drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCPX and ATCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXCPXATCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-53.70%

+44.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.49%

-3.31%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.49%

-53.70%

+52.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.10%

-53.70%

+44.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.10%

-53.70%

+44.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-46.22%

+45.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-10.12%

+8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.08%

-0.70%

Volatility

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series (EXCPX) is 0.82%, while Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund (ATCSX) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that EXCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXCPXATCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.88%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

4.45%

-2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17%

6.14%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.82%

50.60%

-47.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.40%

35.94%

-33.54%

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXCPX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than ATCSX's 4.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EXCPX vs. ATCSX - Dividend Comparison

EXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, less than ATCSX's 9.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATCSX
Anchor Risk Managed Credit Strategies Fund
9.40%9.26%12.69%3.16%0.00%2.48%1.46%3.04%0.27%2.76%2.91%0.00%
EXCPX
Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series
4.29%4.36%4.32%3.72%2.58%5.66%2.61%2.37%2.56%2.28%1.95%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


EXCPX and ATCSX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATCSX has higher volatility (1.88%) compared to EXCPX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXCPX dropped -9.65% vs ATCSX's -53.70%.

EXCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXCPX and ATCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer