PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZS vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZS vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZS achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZS has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 4.94%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


EWZS

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.77%
6M
-10.01%
YTD
3.21%
1Y
15.12%
3Y*
-1.60%
5Y*
-2.31%
10Y*
4.94%
ALL TIME*
-1.15%

IVV

1D
0.69%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.11%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.16M$1.70M$5.15M
$3.36B$3.31B$5.91B

EWZS vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.21%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZS and IVV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010

0.46

The correlation between EWZS and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (5 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZS vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZS
IVV

Real Estate

14.7%
1.9%

Utilities

13.8%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
8.9%

Basic Materials

11.2%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
4.8%

Industrials

9.6%
7.9%

Financial Services

8.5%
12.5%

Healthcare

5.9%
9.4%

Technology

5.7%
37.2%

Energy

5.3%
3.3%

Communication Services

-

9.6%

Real Estate

EWZS
14.7%
IVV
1.9%

Utilities

EWZS
13.8%
IVV
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZS
11.3%
IVV
8.9%

Basic Materials

EWZS
11.2%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWZS
9.8%
IVV
4.8%

Industrials

EWZS
9.6%
IVV
7.9%

Financial Services

EWZS
8.5%
IVV
12.5%

Healthcare

EWZS
5.9%
IVV
9.4%

Technology

EWZS
5.7%
IVV
37.2%

Energy

EWZS
5.3%
IVV
3.3%

Communication Services

EWZS

-

IVV
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZS vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWZS vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWZSIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

2.21

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

9.43

-7.76

EWZS vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZS and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWZS vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZS drawdown since its inception was -79.23%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZS and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZSIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.23%

-55.25%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.53%

-8.89%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.33%

-18.75%

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.60%

-24.53%

-18.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.15%

-33.90%

-29.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.13%

-1.41%

-30.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-10.72%

-25.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.67%

2.09%

+7.58%

Volatility

EWZS vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.52%. This indicates that EWZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZSIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

3.52%

+4.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.39%

10.18%

+14.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.89%

12.89%

+18.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.01%

17.01%

+16.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

18.06%

+18.63%

EWZS vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZS vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EWZS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.87%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZS and IVV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to IVV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZS dropped -79.23% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.11% vs 4.94% for EWZS. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZS.

EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

EWZS is categorized as Latin America Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZS and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZS and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer