PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZ vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZ vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZ has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 7.81%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


EWZ

1D
-3.19%
1M
-11.27%
YTD
9.03%
6M
4.84%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
7.81%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
9.03%48.81%-30.41%32.62%12.09%-17.32%-20.35%27.67%-2.52%23.62%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and ACWI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.62

The correlation between EWZ and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (5 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZ vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZ
ACWI

Financial Services

32.7%
16.1%

Energy

18.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

13.7%
3.7%

Utilities

12.9%
2.6%

Industrials

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.0%

Healthcare

2.4%
8.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
9.3%

Technology

1.0%
29.4%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Financial Services

EWZ
32.7%
ACWI
16.1%

Energy

EWZ
18.5%
ACWI
4.2%

Basic Materials

EWZ
13.7%
ACWI
3.7%

Utilities

EWZ
12.9%
ACWI
2.6%

Industrials

EWZ
10.9%
ACWI
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

EWZ
4.2%
ACWI
5.0%

Healthcare

EWZ
2.4%
ACWI
8.1%

Communication Services

EWZ
2.2%
ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZ
1.5%
ACWI
9.3%

Technology

EWZ
1.0%
ACWI
29.4%

Real Estate

EWZ

-

ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZ vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ
EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWZACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.41

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.01

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

13.53

-7.42

EWZ vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWZACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.29

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.71

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.75

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.43

-0.26

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.25%

-56.00%

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.99%

-9.73%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.36%

-16.55%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.24%

-26.42%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-33.53%

-23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.07%

-0.83%

-23.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.95%

-8.61%

-27.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

2.16%

+3.17%

Volatility

EWZ vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that EWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

3.93%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.78%

10.29%

+10.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.97%

12.78%

+12.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.68%

16.05%

+11.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.10%

17.11%

+16.99%

EWZ vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZ vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
4.76%5.19%8.91%5.66%12.59%9.87%1.71%2.54%2.89%1.71%1.81%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZ and ACWI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZ has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 7.81% for EWZ. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZ and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer