EWY vs. XSD
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 30.26%/yr for XSD. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XSD.
Performance
EWY vs. XSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than XSD's 88.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has underperformed XSD with an annualized return of 16.84%, while XSD has yielded a comparatively higher 30.26% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
XSD
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 88.46%
- 6M
- 84.83%
- 1Y
- 147.81%
- 3Y*
- 40.43%
- 5Y*
- 27.60%
- 10Y*
- 30.26%
EWY vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 88.46% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and XSD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EWY and XSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
XSD
Technology
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
XSD
Industrials
EWY
XSD
-
Financial Services
EWY
XSD
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
XSD
-
Healthcare
EWY
XSD
-
Communication Services
EWY
XSD
-
Basic Materials
EWY
XSD
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
XSD
-
Energy
EWY
XSD
Utilities
EWY
XSD
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
XSD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
XSD
EWY vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.53 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 7.99 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 26.64 | +3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than XSD's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and XSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -64.56% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -18.61% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -41.25% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -42.27% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -42.27% | -7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -6.77% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -13.73% | -6.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 5.57% | +1.02% |
Volatility
EWY vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) at 20.05%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | XSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 20.05% | +5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 31.79% | +10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 39.14% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 38.80% | -8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 35.26% | -7.20% |
EWY vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than XSD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and XSD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to XSD (20.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs XSD's -64.56%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 30.26% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XSD has been the lower-risk option at 20.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 30.26% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XSD is Semiconductors. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.35% for XSD.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 3.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and XSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer