EWY vs. SLV
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 17.46%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EWY vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 119.05% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 17.46%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 30.18%
- YTD
- 119.05%
- 6M
- 134.13%
- 1Y
- 251.82%
- 3Y*
- 51.99%
- 5Y*
- 20.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.46%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
EWY vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 119.05% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and SLV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.29 |
EWY vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
SLV
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
SLV
-
Industrials
EWY
SLV
-
Financial Services
EWY
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
SLV
-
Healthcare
EWY
SLV
-
Communication Services
EWY
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EWY
SLV
Consumer Defensive
EWY
SLV
-
Energy
EWY
SLV
-
Utilities
EWY
SLV
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
SLV
EWY vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWY | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.35 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.99 | 2.62 | +8.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.91 | 5.64 | +35.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWY | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.02 | 1.89 | +4.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.58 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.49 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.25 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
EWY vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -76.28% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -42.45% | +19.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -42.45% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -42.45% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -42.81% | -6.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -37.30% | +35.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.13% | -44.67% | +24.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 19.67% | -13.48% |
Volatility
EWY vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 20.32% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.30%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.32% | 16.30% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | 58.31% | -20.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.10% | 58.90% | -16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 36.15% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 31.84% | -4.47% |
EWY vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 0.96% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and SLV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to SLV (16.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.46% vs 15.55% for SLV. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SLV has been the lower-risk option at 16.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SLV is Silver. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.50% for SLV.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer