EWY vs. PSI
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 34.59%/yr for PSI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
EWY vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 112.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has underperformed PSI with an annualized return of 16.84%, while PSI has yielded a comparatively higher 34.59% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
PSI
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 10.45%
- YTD
- 112.90%
- 6M
- 110.54%
- 1Y
- 198.40%
- 3Y*
- 55.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.57%
- 10Y*
- 34.59%
EWY vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 112.90% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 49.06% | -34.43% | 46.55% | 56.75% | 52.49% | -11.55% | 40.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and PSI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EWY and PSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
PSI
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
PSI
Industrials
EWY
PSI
Financial Services
EWY
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
PSI
-
Healthcare
EWY
PSI
-
Communication Services
EWY
PSI
-
Basic Materials
EWY
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
EWY
PSI
-
Energy
EWY
PSI
-
Utilities
EWY
PSI
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
PSI
EWY vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.63 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 12.90 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 45.29 | -15.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than PSI's maximum drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -62.96% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -15.48% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -41.07% | +13.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -44.85% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -44.85% | -4.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | 0.00% | -8.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -15.92% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 4.40% | +2.19% |
Volatility
EWY vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) at 18.89%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 18.89% | +6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 33.67% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 40.58% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 38.44% | -8.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 35.42% | -7.36% |
EWY vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than PSI's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and PSI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to PSI (18.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 10-year performance, PSI leads with 34.59% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, PSI is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PSI has been the lower-risk option at 18.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSI has performed better with a 34.59% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSI is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.04% for PSI.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.92 vs 4.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer