EWY vs. PICK
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while PICK is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for PICK. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
EWY vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than PICK's 26.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 16.84%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
PICK
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 26.76%
- 6M
- 32.91%
- 1Y
- 77.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.70%
EWY vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 26.76% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and PICK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.61 |
The correlation between EWY and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
PICK
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
PICK
Industrials
EWY
PICK
Financial Services
EWY
PICK
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
PICK
-
Healthcare
EWY
PICK
-
Communication Services
EWY
PICK
-
Basic Materials
EWY
PICK
Consumer Defensive
EWY
PICK
Energy
EWY
PICK
Utilities
EWY
PICK
-
Real Estate
EWY
-
PICK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
PICK
EWY vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.44 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 4.00 | +4.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 15.40 | +14.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than PICK's maximum drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -68.87% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -19.54% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -32.52% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -36.37% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -52.72% | +2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -5.59% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -24.08% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 5.07% | +1.52% |
Volatility
EWY vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 13.70%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 13.70% | +11.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 25.93% | +16.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 29.74% | +16.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 28.11% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 28.46% | -0.40% |
EWY vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than PICK's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.27% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and PICK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to PICK (13.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.70% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, PICK has been the lower-risk option at 13.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.70% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PICK is Materials. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.39% for PICK.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer