EWY vs. KMCA
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and KMCA (PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF) are both South Korea Equities funds - EWY tracks the MSCI Korea Index while KMCA tracks the Akros Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KMCA.
Performance
EWY vs. KMCA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EWY
- 1D
- -8.45%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- 6M
- 54.25%
- YTD
- 72.82%
- 1Y
- 136.76%
- 3Y*
- 39.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
KMCA
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -21.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWY vs. KMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | -7.67% |
KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF | -20.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and KMCA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. KMCA — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
KMCA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EWY vs. KMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF (KMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | KMCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. KMCA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than KMCA's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and KMCA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | KMCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -26.25% | -47.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.35% | -26.25% | +2.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -10.02% | -10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | — | — |
Volatility
EWY vs. KMCA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | KMCA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.11% | 77.15% | -26.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 77.15% | -45.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 77.15% | -48.35% |
EWY vs. KMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KMCA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. KMCA - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while KMCA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.21% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
KMCA PLUS Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and KMCA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KMCA.
EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for KMCA.
EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while KMCA tracks Akros Korea Manufacturing Core Alliance Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PLUS. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.65% for KMCA.
Find the right allocation for EWY and KMCA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer