EWY vs. FPA
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EWY tracks the MSCI Korea Index while FPA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for FPA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FPA.
Performance
EWY vs. FPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than FPA's 47.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed FPA with an annualized return of 16.84%, while FPA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
FPA
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 47.02%
- 6M
- 47.32%
- 1Y
- 65.35%
- 3Y*
- 29.68%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
EWY vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 47.02% | 43.16% | 3.95% | 9.97% | -14.55% | 2.98% | 13.43% | 8.91% | -21.91% | 35.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and FPA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EWY and FPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. FPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
FPA
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
FPA
Industrials
EWY
FPA
Financial Services
EWY
FPA
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
FPA
Healthcare
EWY
FPA
Communication Services
EWY
FPA
Basic Materials
EWY
FPA
Consumer Defensive
EWY
FPA
Energy
EWY
FPA
Utilities
EWY
FPA
Real Estate
EWY
-
FPA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
FPA
EWY vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.42 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 4.32 | +4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 14.88 | +15.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than FPA's maximum drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and FPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -52.91% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -15.37% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -20.66% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -34.54% | -14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -52.91% | +3.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -6.94% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -13.47% | -6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 4.46% | +2.13% |
Volatility
EWY vs. FPA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) at 14.55%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | FPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 14.55% | +11.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 24.45% | +18.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 27.61% | +18.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 24.43% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 22.63% | +5.43% |
EWY vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FPA's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 3.63% | 4.71% | 3.40% | 3.02% | 4.22% | 5.12% | 1.59% | 3.90% | 2.81% | 3.15% | 2.42% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and FPA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to FPA (14.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs FPA's -52.91%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 11.11% for FPA. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FPA has been the lower-risk option at 14.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.
FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.80% for FPA.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and FPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer