EWY vs. EPHE
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while EPHE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 14.08%/yr vs -3.39%/yr for EPHE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EWY vs. EPHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 72.82% return, which is significantly higher than EPHE's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed EPHE with an annualized return of 14.08%, while EPHE has yielded a comparatively lower -3.39% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -8.45%
- 1M
- -14.91%
- 6M
- 54.25%
- YTD
- 72.82%
- 1Y
- 136.76%
- 3Y*
- 39.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
EPHE
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- -5.56%
- 3Y*
- -0.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.57%
- 10Y*
- -3.39%
EWY vs. EPHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 72.82% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.00% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and EPHE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2010 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and EPHE has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWY vs. EPHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
EPHE
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
EPHE
-
Industrials
EWY
EPHE
Financial Services
EWY
EPHE
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
EPHE
Healthcare
EWY
EPHE
-
Communication Services
EWY
EPHE
Basic Materials
EWY
EPHE
Consumer Defensive
EWY
EPHE
Energy
EWY
EPHE
Utilities
EWY
EPHE
Real Estate
EWY
-
EPHE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. EPHE — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
EPHE
EWY vs. EPHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.97 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.89 | -0.35 | +6.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.50 | -0.61 | +19.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. EPHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than EPHE's maximum drawdown of -53.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and EPHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -53.82% | -20.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -15.90% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -21.42% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.23% | -32.96% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -51.62% | +1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.35% | -32.56% | +9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.09% | -21.06% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | 9.13% | -1.71% |
Volatility
EWY vs. EPHE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) at 9.64%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | EPHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.85% | 9.64% | +16.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.91% | 15.92% | +31.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.11% | 20.62% | +30.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 18.45% | +13.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.80% | 22.28% | +6.52% |
EWY vs. EPHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWY and EPHE have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EWY vs. EPHE - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than EPHE's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.72% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.21% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and EPHE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to EPHE (9.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs EPHE's -53.82%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 14.08% vs -3.39% for EPHE. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 9.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 14.08% return vs -3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY and EPHE have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
EPHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.21% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while EPHE is Asia Pacific Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and EPHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer