EWY vs. DXJ
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 18.72%/yr for DXJ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
EWY vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 16.84%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 19.84%
- 1Y
- 53.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- 26.01%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
EWY vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.74% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and DXJ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWY and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
DXJ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
DXJ
Industrials
EWY
DXJ
Financial Services
EWY
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
DXJ
Healthcare
EWY
DXJ
Communication Services
EWY
DXJ
Basic Materials
EWY
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
EWY
DXJ
Energy
EWY
DXJ
Utilities
EWY
DXJ
Real Estate
EWY
-
DXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
DXJ
EWY vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.54 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 4.88 | +3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 18.93 | +11.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -49.63% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -10.98% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -22.19% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -22.19% | -26.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -39.14% | -10.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -1.34% | -7.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -14.32% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 2.83% | +3.76% |
Volatility
EWY vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 4.64% | +21.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 13.56% | +29.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 17.73% | +28.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 19.02% | +11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 20.17% | +7.89% |
EWY vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than DXJ's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and DXJ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 16.84% for EWY. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 16.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.48% for DXJ.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer