EWY vs. COLO
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and COLO (Global X MSCI Colombia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while COLO is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for COLO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWY charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for COLO.
Performance
EWY vs. COLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than COLO's 23.32% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed COLO with an annualized return of 16.84%, while COLO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 198.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
COLO
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 22.56%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 61.24%
- 3Y*
- 35.23%
- 5Y*
- 16.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
EWY vs. COLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 23.32% | 68.88% | 4.68% | 24.92% | -21.32% | -11.50% | -14.60% | 30.42% | -19.88% | 11.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and COLO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2009 | 0.46 |
The correlation between EWY and COLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWY vs. COLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
COLO
Technology
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
EWY
COLO
-
Industrials
EWY
COLO
Financial Services
EWY
COLO
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
COLO
Healthcare
EWY
COLO
-
Communication Services
EWY
COLO
Basic Materials
EWY
COLO
Consumer Defensive
EWY
COLO
-
Energy
EWY
COLO
Utilities
EWY
COLO
Real Estate
EWY
-
COLO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. COLO — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
COLO
EWY vs. COLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.46 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.46 | +5.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 9.36 | +20.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. COLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, smaller than the maximum COLO drawdown of -78.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and COLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -78.91% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -17.79% | -5.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -18.35% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -43.86% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -62.75% | +13.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -16.29% | +7.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -40.28% | +20.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 6.56% | +0.03% |
Volatility
EWY vs. COLO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) at 11.56%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | COLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 11.56% | +14.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 20.33% | +22.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 23.03% | +23.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 23.37% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 25.47% | +2.59% |
EWY vs. COLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than COLO's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWY vs. COLO - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than COLO's 6.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLO Global X MSCI Colombia ETF | 6.09% | 7.51% | 6.08% | 6.99% | 12.55% | 2.32% | 3.23% | 3.04% | 3.03% | 1.83% | 1.48% | 1.58% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and COLO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to COLO (11.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs COLO's -78.91%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 7.08% for COLO. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, COLO has been the lower-risk option at 11.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for COLO.
COLO has the higher dividend yield at 6.09%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while COLO is Latin America Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while COLO tracks MSCI All Colombia Select 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.62% for COLO.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and COLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer