EWX vs. EMCR
EWX (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF) and EMCR (Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EWX tracks the S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index while EMCR tracks the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWX returned 6.92%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for EMCR. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCR.
Performance
EWX vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWX achieves a 13.61% return, which is significantly lower than EMCR's 18.98% return.
EWX
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 13.61%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.92%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
EMCR
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 41.37%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EWX vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWX SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF | 13.61% | 15.46% | 6.81% | 18.13% | -15.00% | 18.15% | 14.84% | 15.59% | -3.04% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 18.98% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 22.41% | -2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWX and EMCR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between EWX and EMCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWX vs. EMCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWX
EMCR
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
EWX
EMCR
Industrials
EWX
EMCR
Basic Materials
EWX
EMCR
Consumer Cyclical
EWX
EMCR
Financial Services
EWX
EMCR
Healthcare
EWX
EMCR
Consumer Defensive
EWX
EMCR
Real Estate
EWX
EMCR
Energy
EWX
EMCR
Utilities
EWX
EMCR
Communication Services
EWX
EMCR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWX vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank
EWX
EMCR
EWX vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWX | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 3.00 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 11.00 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWX vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWX and EMCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWX | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.90% | -34.28% | -29.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.98% | -13.84% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.37% | -18.38% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -34.28% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -5.03% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -9.29% | -3.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.77% | -1.18% |
Volatility
EWX vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) is 8.08%, while Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that EWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWX | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 11.58% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.09% | 19.77% | -5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 21.97% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 19.82% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 20.14% | -2.97% |
EWX vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWX vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison
EWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than EMCR's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.47% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWX SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF | 2.49% | 2.91% | 2.90% | 2.32% | 3.00% | 2.77% | 2.24% | 2.73% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 2.46% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWX and EMCR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMCR has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to EWX (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWX dropped -63.90% vs EMCR's -34.28%.
On 5-year performance, EMCR leads with 8.45% vs 6.92% for EWX. On fees, EMCR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EWX has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMCR has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMCR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EWX.
EWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.47% for EMCR.
EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index, while EMCR tracks Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EWX and 0.15% for EMCR.
EMCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWX and EMCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer