EWV vs. TSLG
EWV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EWV is passively managed, while TSLG is actively managed. Over the past year, EWV returned -43.86% vs 7.28% for TSLG. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. EWV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
EWV vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -27.97% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -20.82% return.
EWV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -27.97%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -43.86%
- 3Y*
- -28.45%
- 5Y*
- -17.58%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
TSLG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.71%
- YTD
- -20.82%
- 6M
- -21.35%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWV vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | -27.97% | -37.70% | 4.58% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -20.82% | -26.70% | -16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWV and TSLG is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWV vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
EWV
TSLG
EWV vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWV | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.09 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.13 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 0.28 | -1.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWV | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | 0.08 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -0.34 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EWV vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWV | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.13% | -82.86% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.88% | -54.61% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.13% | -60.00% | -39.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.28% | -58.73% | -25.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.05% | 26.63% | +2.42% |
Volatility
EWV vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) is 9.11%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 24.41%. This indicates that EWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWV | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 24.41% | -15.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.22% | 54.58% | -23.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 92.53% | -52.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 115.31% | -78.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 115.31% | -80.36% |
EWV vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWV vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than TSLG's 8.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | 4.98% | 3.63% | 3.39% | 3.42% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 8.27% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWV and TSLG have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLG has higher volatility (24.41%) compared to EWV (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.13% vs TSLG's -82.86%.
On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 7.28% vs -43.86% for EWV. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, EWV has been the lower-risk option at 9.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 7.28% return vs -43.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EWV.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 4.98% for EWV.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EWV and 0.75% for TSLG.
TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWV and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer