EWV vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EWV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - EWV is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (-200%), while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWV returned -20.00%/yr vs 42.73%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

EWV vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -29.93% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 42.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EWV has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -20.00%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 42.73% annualized return.

EWV

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -4.20%
• 6M: -23.47%
• YTD: -29.93%
• 1Y: -47.17%
• 3Y*: -28.49%
• 5Y*: -18.46%
• 10Y*: -20.00%

TQQQ

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: -3.00%
• 6M: 35.46%
• YTD: 42.86%
• 1Y: 78.48%
• 3Y*: 52.21%
• 5Y*: 19.60%
• 10Y*: 42.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWV vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan	-29.93%	-37.70%	-11.06%	-28.34%	34.35%	-10.19%	-38.57%	-30.38%	29.90%	-36.24%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	42.86%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EWV and TQQQ is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	-0.59

The correlation between EWV and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EWV vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWV

EWV Risk / Return Rank: 1
EWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
EWV Omega Ratio Rank: 1
EWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
EWV Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 50
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWV vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWV	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.12	1.43	-2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	1.90	-3.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.25	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	2.13	-3.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	6.53	-7.97

EWV vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWV Sharpe Ratio is -1.12, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWV and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWV vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWV	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.20%	-81.66%	-17.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.16%	-36.97%	-14.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-71.19%	-58.04%	-13.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-79.51%	-81.66%	+2.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.92%	-81.66%	-8.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.16%	-13.79%	-85.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.34%	-18.48%	-65.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.87%	12.05%	+20.82%

Volatility

EWV vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) is 14.40%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 23.84%. This indicates that EWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWV	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.40%	23.84%	-9.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.86%	45.82%	-10.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.40%	55.29%	-12.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.25%	67.76%	-30.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.15%	66.41%	-31.26%

EWV vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWV and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

EWV vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than TQQQ's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan	5.16%	3.63%	3.39%	3.42%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.50%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWV and TQQQ in my portfolio?

EWV and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWV or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (23.84%) compared to EWV (14.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.20% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, EWV or TQQQ?

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 42.73% vs -20.00% for EWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EWV has been the lower-risk option at 14.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWV or TQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 42.73% return vs -20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWV or TQQQ?

EWV and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWV or TQQQ?

EWV has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.50% for TQQQ.

What is the main difference between EWV and TQQQ?

EWV is categorized as Japan Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. EWV tracks MSCI Japan Index (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.