EWV vs. QTAP
EWV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EWV is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWV returned -17.58%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for QTAP. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. EWV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
EWV vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -27.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 14.67% return.
EWV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -27.97%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -43.86%
- 3Y*
- -28.45%
- 5Y*
- -17.58%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EWV vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | -27.97% | -37.70% | -11.06% | -28.34% | 34.35% | -3.91% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWV and QTAP is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | -0.56 |
The correlation between EWV and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.56 to -0.49 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWV vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
EWV
QTAP
EWV vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWV | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 2.23 | -1.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 15.20 | -16.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 80.04 | -81.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWV | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | 4.62 | -5.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.73 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.75 | -1.22 |
Drawdowns
EWV vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWV | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.13% | -29.44% | -69.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.88% | -1.69% | -45.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.67% | -13.03% | -55.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.72% | -29.44% | -48.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.13% | -0.10% | -99.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.28% | -5.04% | -79.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.05% | 0.32% | +28.73% |
Volatility
EWV vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that EWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWV | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 1.33% | +7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.22% | 3.97% | +27.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 5.56% | +34.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 18.89% | +17.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 18.77% | +16.18% |
EWV vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWV vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | 4.98% | 3.63% | 3.39% | 3.42% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWV and QTAP have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWV has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.13% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 13.78% vs -17.58% for EWV. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 13.78% return vs -17.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EWV.
EWV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EWV and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWV and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer