PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. FSZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. FSZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ's 3.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EWU has underperformed FSZ with an annualized return of 8.60%, while FSZ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.31% annualized return.


EWU

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
4.82%
6M
4.59%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
8.60%

FSZ

1D
0.51%
1M
0.58%
YTD
3.05%
6M
2.06%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
10.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. FSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
4.82%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
3.05%30.10%-1.85%21.30%-20.12%20.18%13.83%25.88%-15.22%31.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and FSZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.66

The correlation between EWU and FSZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWU vs. FSZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
FSZ

Financial Services

25.7%
22.0%

Healthcare

14.5%
14.6%

Industrials

13.2%
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.1%
4.9%

Energy

11.6%

-

Basic Materials

9.5%
9.8%

Utilities

5.1%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
7.3%

Communication Services

2.3%
2.4%

Technology

0.7%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.6%
2.4%

Financial Services

EWU
25.7%
FSZ
22.0%

Healthcare

EWU
14.5%
FSZ
14.6%

Industrials

EWU
13.2%
FSZ
17.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWU
13.1%
FSZ
4.9%

Energy

EWU
11.6%
FSZ

-

Basic Materials

EWU
9.5%
FSZ
9.8%

Utilities

EWU
5.1%
FSZ
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
3.8%
FSZ
7.3%

Communication Services

EWU
2.3%
FSZ
2.4%

Technology

EWU
0.7%
FSZ
4.9%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
FSZ
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. FSZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FSZ
FSZ Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FSZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FSZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. FSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWUFSZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.98

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.62

2.39

+4.23

EWU vs. FSZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the FSZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and FSZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWU vs. FSZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, which is greater than FSZ's maximum drawdown of -33.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and FSZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUFSZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-33.97%

-30.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.39%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-13.93%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-33.96%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

-33.97%

-9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.30%

-4.17%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.14%

-6.98%

-7.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

4.25%

-1.34%

Volatility

EWU vs. FSZ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund (FSZ) have volatilities of 4.02% and 4.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUFSZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.07%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

11.06%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

14.25%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

19.35%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

18.75%

-0.40%

EWU vs. FSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWU vs. FSZ - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than FSZ's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.29%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%
FSZ
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX Fund
2.37%1.80%1.80%2.11%3.50%1.62%1.53%2.01%2.29%1.49%1.93%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and FSZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSZ has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to EWU (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs FSZ's -33.97%.

On 10-year performance, FSZ leads with 10.31% vs 8.60% for EWU. On fees, EWU is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FSZ has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWU is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FSZ.

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.37% for FSZ.

EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while FSZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Switzerland Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.80% for FSZ.

EWU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and FSZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer