EWT vs. DBP
EWT (iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF) and DBP (Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EWT is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan Index, while DBP is a Precious Metals fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWT returned 19.56%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for DBP. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBP.
Performance
EWT vs. DBP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWT achieves a 61.53% return, which is significantly higher than DBP's -3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EWT has outperformed DBP with an annualized return of 19.56%, while DBP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.21% annualized return.
EWT
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 61.53%
- 6M
- 67.45%
- 1Y
- 92.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 19.56%
DBP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -11.93%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 30.66%
- 3Y*
- 29.99%
- 5Y*
- 16.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
EWT vs. DBP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 61.53% | 28.38% | 16.11% | 23.97% | -28.90% | 26.18% | 31.50% | 33.36% | -9.90% | 26.81% |
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | -3.82% | 73.43% | 26.71% | 8.68% | -1.51% | -7.10% | 26.79% | 15.89% | -4.31% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWT and DBP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2007 | 0.18 |
The correlation between EWT and DBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.31 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWT vs. DBP — Risk / Return Rank
EWT
DBP
EWT vs. DBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) and Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWT | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.20 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.53 | 1.07 | +7.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.15 | 2.77 | +22.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWT vs. DBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWT drawdown since its inception was -64.37%, which is greater than DBP's maximum drawdown of -53.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWT and DBP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWT | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.37% | -53.89% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.51% | -30.03% | +19.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -30.03% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.88% | -30.03% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.88% | -30.03% | -8.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.19% | -27.52% | +23.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -25.42% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 11.56% | -8.00% |
Volatility
EWT vs. DBP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) has a higher volatility of 13.55% compared to Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) at 9.06%. This indicates that EWT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWT | DBP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.55% | 9.06% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 30.70% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.75% | 33.35% | -6.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.95% | 21.14% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 18.84% | +2.94% |
EWT vs. DBP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DBP's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWT vs. DBP - Dividend Comparison
EWT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than DBP's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBP Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund | 2.53% | 2.44% | 4.21% | 4.47% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 1.24% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | 2.74% | 4.43% | 3.32% | 8.12% | 18.82% | 0.55% | 1.83% | 2.49% | 3.16% | 2.81% | 2.39% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWT and DBP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWT has higher volatility (13.55%) compared to DBP (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWT dropped -64.37% vs DBP's -53.89%.
On 10-year performance, EWT leads with 19.56% vs 11.21% for DBP. On fees, EWT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 9.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWT has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.
EWT has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.53% for DBP.
EWT is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DBP is Precious Metals. EWT tracks MSCI Taiwan Index, while DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWT and 0.78% for DBP.
EWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWT and DBP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer