PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWQ vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWQ vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EWQ has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 9.13%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


EWQ

1D
-1.19%
1M
2.85%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.17%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.13%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWQ vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
1.20%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EWQ and IAU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.18

The correlation between EWQ and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWQ vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWQ
IAU

Industrials

31.7%

-

Financial Services

12.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.3%

-

Energy

8.0%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Technology

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.4%
100.0%

Industrials

EWQ
31.7%
IAU

-

Financial Services

EWQ
12.8%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWQ
12.0%
IAU

-

Healthcare

EWQ
8.4%
IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

EWQ
8.3%
IAU

-

Energy

EWQ
8.0%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

EWQ
7.0%
IAU

-

Technology

EWQ
4.1%
IAU

-

Communication Services

EWQ
3.0%
IAU

-

Utilities

EWQ
2.6%
IAU

-

Real Estate

EWQ
1.4%
IAU
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWQ vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWQ vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWQIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

1.69

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

4.19

-2.10

EWQ vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWQ and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWQIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.23

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

1.03

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.84

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.62

-0.35

Drawdowns

EWQ vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWQIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-45.14%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-19.18%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-19.18%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-20.93%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-21.82%

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-17.70%

+11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-15.96%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

7.71%

-3.25%

Volatility

EWQ vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that EWQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWQIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

5.50%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

23.02%

-9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

26.42%

-9.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

17.95%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

15.90%

+4.91%

EWQ vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWQ vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.60%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWQ and IAU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWQ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 9.13% for EWQ. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWQ.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

EWQ is categorized as Europe Equities, while IAU is Gold. EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.25% for IAU.

IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWQ and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer