PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.11%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


EWP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.54%
YTD
6.62%
6M
12.03%
1Y
34.29%
3Y*
31.36%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
11.11%

SCHD

1D
0.59%
1M
1.60%
YTD
19.01%
6M
20.36%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
6.62%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and SCHD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EWP and SCHD has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWP vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
SCHD

Financial Services

41.4%
9.3%

Utilities

21.2%
0.0%

Industrials

16.1%
7.5%

Energy

5.3%
16.2%

Technology

4.9%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
6.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
6.3%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Healthcare

1.3%
18.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Financial Services

EWP
41.4%
SCHD
9.3%

Utilities

EWP
21.2%
SCHD
0.0%

Industrials

EWP
16.1%
SCHD
7.5%

Energy

EWP
5.3%
SCHD
16.2%

Technology

EWP
4.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.0%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

EWP
2.9%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

EWP
2.9%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
SCHD
18.8%

Basic Materials

EWP

-

SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

SCHD
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWPSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.57

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.98

-1.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

6.17

-2.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.33

15.20

-3.88

EWP vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWPSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.57

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.86

-0.55

Drawdowns

EWP vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-33.37%

-27.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-4.61%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-16.13%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-16.85%

-17.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-33.37%

-12.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.40%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-3.32%

-18.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.87%

+1.32%

Volatility

EWP vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.92%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

2.92%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

7.66%

+7.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

10.96%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

14.38%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

16.72%

+5.51%

EWP vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.13%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and SCHD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to SCHD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 11.11% for EWP. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.13% for EWP.

EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer