PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. PPTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. PPTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than PPTA's -0.50% return.


EWP

1D
0.63%
1M
4.02%
YTD
8.89%
6M
11.54%
1Y
36.89%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
17.57%
10Y*
12.33%

PPTA

1D
2.77%
1M
-24.17%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-16.47%
1Y
83.61%
3Y*
77.19%
5Y*
22.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. PPTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
8.89%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.14%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp
-0.50%126.90%236.59%8.56%-38.53%-34.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and PPTA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2021

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. PPTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PPTA
PPTA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PPTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PPTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. PPTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWPPPTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.97

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

5.23

+6.28

EWP vs. PPTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the PPTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and PPTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWP vs. PPTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum PPTA drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and PPTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPPPTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-81.78%

+20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-42.61%

+31.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-42.61%

+30.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-81.78%

+47.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-35.28%

+35.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.41%

-38.70%

+17.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

16.04%

-12.82%

Volatility

EWP vs. PPTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is 6.21%, while Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) has a volatility of 25.93%. This indicates that EWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPPPTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

25.93%

-19.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

56.52%

-40.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.13%

75.66%

-56.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

72.00%

-51.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

72.22%

-50.00%

Dividends

EWP vs. PPTA - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while PPTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.09%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and PPTA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPTA has higher volatility (25.93%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs PPTA's -81.78%.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and PPTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer