PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. IEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. IEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Europe ETF (IEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWP having a 5.49% return and IEV slightly lower at 5.38%. Over the past 10 years, EWP has outperformed IEV with an annualized return of 10.99%, while IEV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


EWP

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.64%
YTD
5.49%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
10.99%

IEV

1D
-1.26%
1M
2.73%
YTD
5.38%
6M
8.19%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. IEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.49%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
5.38%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and IEV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000

0.83

The correlation between EWP and IEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWP vs. IEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
IEV

Financial Services

41.4%
23.9%

Utilities

21.2%
5.0%

Industrials

16.1%
19.3%

Energy

5.3%
5.6%

Technology

4.9%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.9%
0.8%

Healthcare

1.3%
13.1%

Basic Materials

-

5.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.3%

Financial Services

EWP
41.4%
IEV
23.9%

Utilities

EWP
21.2%
IEV
5.0%

Industrials

EWP
16.1%
IEV
19.3%

Energy

EWP
5.3%
IEV
5.6%

Technology

EWP
4.9%
IEV
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.0%
IEV
6.7%

Communication Services

EWP
2.9%
IEV
2.9%

Real Estate

EWP
2.9%
IEV
0.8%

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
IEV
13.1%

Basic Materials

EWP

-

IEV
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

IEV
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. IEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. IEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Europe ETF (IEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWPIEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.45

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

5.29

+5.63

EWP vs. IEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and IEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWPIEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.14

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.49

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.23

+0.08

Drawdowns

EWP vs. IEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IEV drawdown of -63.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and IEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPIEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-63.27%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-12.31%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-14.63%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-30.60%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-36.62%

-9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-2.77%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-15.04%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.36%

-0.17%

Volatility

EWP vs. IEV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to iShares Europe ETF (IEV) at 5.61%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPIEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

5.61%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

12.95%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

15.62%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.57%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

18.66%

+3.57%

EWP vs. IEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IEV's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. IEV - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than IEV's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.15%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.59%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and IEV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to IEV (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs IEV's -63.27%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 10.99% vs 9.06% for IEV. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.

IEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.15% for EWP.

EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.59% for IEV.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and IEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer