PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWP vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWP vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EWP has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 10.99%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.


EWP

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.64%
YTD
5.49%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
10.99%

IAU

1D
-0.98%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
2.98%
6M
5.50%
1Y
32.20%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
13.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.49%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
2.98%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and IAU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005

0.17

The correlation between EWP and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (10 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWP vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWP
IAU

Financial Services

41.4%

-

Utilities

21.2%

-

Industrials

16.1%

-

Energy

5.3%

-

Technology

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Real Estate

2.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

EWP
41.4%
IAU

-

Utilities

EWP
21.2%
IAU

-

Industrials

EWP
16.1%
IAU

-

Energy

EWP
5.3%
IAU

-

Technology

EWP
4.9%
IAU

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWP
4.0%
IAU

-

Communication Services

EWP
2.9%
IAU

-

Real Estate

EWP
2.9%
IAU
100.0%

Healthcare

EWP
1.3%
IAU

-

Basic Materials

EWP

-

IAU

-

Consumer Defensive

EWP

-

IAU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWP vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWPIAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.23

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

1.62

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.69

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.91

4.19

+6.73

EWP vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWPIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.23

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

1.03

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.84

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.62

-0.31

Drawdowns

EWP vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWPIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.19%

-45.14%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-19.18%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-19.18%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-20.93%

-12.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.36%

-21.82%

-24.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.60%

-17.70%

+15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-15.96%

-5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

7.71%

-4.52%

Volatility

EWP vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWPIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

5.50%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

23.02%

-7.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

26.42%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

17.95%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.23%

15.90%

+6.33%

EWP vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWP vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.15%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWP and IAU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs IAU's -45.14%.

On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 10.99% for EWP. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.

EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while IAU is Gold. EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.25% for IAU.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWP and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer