EWP vs. GOEX
EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWP is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Spain Index, while GOEX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWP returned 12.33%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for GOEX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
EWP vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -10.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWP having a 12.33% annualized return and GOEX not far ahead at 12.61%.
EWP
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 32.21%
- 5Y*
- 17.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
GOEX
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -10.45%
- 6M
- -9.61%
- 1Y
- 52.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
EWP vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 8.89% | 78.03% | 5.70% | 30.26% | -5.18% | 0.25% | -3.94% | 11.93% | -15.32% | 26.98% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -10.45% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWP and GOEX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.25 |
The correlation between EWP and GOEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWP vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWP
GOEX
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
EWP
GOEX
-
Utilities
EWP
GOEX
-
Industrials
EWP
GOEX
-
Energy
EWP
GOEX
-
Technology
EWP
GOEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWP
GOEX
-
Communication Services
EWP
GOEX
-
Real Estate
EWP
GOEX
-
Healthcare
EWP
GOEX
-
Basic Materials
EWP
-
GOEX
Consumer Defensive
EWP
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWP vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
EWP
GOEX
EWP vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWP | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.21 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 1.37 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 3.79 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWP vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWP | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.19% | -88.83% | +27.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -39.64% | +28.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.19% | -39.64% | +27.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.76% | -47.16% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.36% | -53.66% | +7.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.91% | +33.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.41% | -63.52% | +42.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 14.30% | -11.08% |
Volatility
EWP vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) is 6.21%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that EWP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWP | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 17.04% | -10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.09% | 41.66% | -25.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.13% | 50.58% | -31.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 39.35% | -19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 40.12% | -17.90% |
EWP vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWP vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than GOEX's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF | 2.09% | 2.27% | 4.35% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.29% | 2.56% | 3.72% | 3.69% | 2.72% | 4.65% | 3.85% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.32% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWP and GOEX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOEX has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 12.61% vs 12.33% for EWP. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 2.09% for EWP.
EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while GOEX is Materials. EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.65% for GOEX.
EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWP and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer