EWP vs. EZU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) and EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EWP tracks the MSCI Spain Index while EZU tracks the MSCI EMU. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWP returned 12.33%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for EZU. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for EZU.

Performance

EWP vs. EZU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWP having a 8.89% return and EZU slightly higher at 9.10%. Over the past 10 years, EWP has outperformed EZU with an annualized return of 12.33%, while EZU has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.

EWP

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 17.57%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

EZU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.05%
• YTD: 9.10%
• 6M: 10.35%
• 1Y: 22.18%
• 3Y*: 18.40%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. EZU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	8.89%	78.03%	5.70%	30.26%	-5.18%	0.25%	-3.94%	11.93%	-15.32%	26.98%
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	9.10%	40.00%	2.23%	23.44%	-17.25%	13.92%	7.62%	23.27%	-16.76%	27.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and EZU is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.85

The correlation between EWP and EZU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWP vs. EZU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWP	EZU
Financial Services	42.4%	23.6%
Utilities	21.4%	6.4%
Industrials	16.3%	20.5%
Technology	5.6%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	7.8%
Energy	4.1%	4.0%
Communication Services	2.8%	5.0%
Real Estate	2.8%	0.7%
Healthcare	1.3%	5.8%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

EWP vs. EZU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP

EWP Risk / Return Rank: 69
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 71

EZU

EZU Risk / Return Rank: 37
EZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
EZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EZU Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EZU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. EZU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWP	EZU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.15	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.71	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.21	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	1.55	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	5.60	+5.91

EWP vs. EZU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the EZU Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and EZU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWP vs. EZU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, smaller than the maximum EZU drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and EZU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWP	EZU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.19%	-65.32%	+4.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-13.06%	+1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	-15.02%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.96%	-36.11%	+3.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.36%	-41.37%	-4.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.41%	-19.21%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.61%	-0.39%

Volatility

EWP vs. EZU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) have volatilities of 6.21% and 6.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWP	EZU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	6.52%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	14.88%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	17.57%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.31%	19.96%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	20.50%	+1.72%

EWP vs. EZU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EZU's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWP vs. EZU - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than EZU's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	2.09%	2.27%	4.35%	2.70%	3.07%	3.29%	2.56%	3.72%	3.69%	2.72%	4.65%	3.85%
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	2.61%	2.85%	2.90%	2.56%	2.79%	2.46%	2.13%	2.84%	3.47%	1.91%	3.07%	2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWP and EZU in my portfolio?

EWP and EZU have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWP or EZU?

EZU has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to EWP (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs EZU's -65.32%.

Which ETF is better, EWP or EZU?

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 12.33% vs 10.85% for EZU. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWP has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWP or EZU?

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWP or EZU?

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWP or EZU?

EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.09% for EWP.

What is the main difference between EWP and EZU?

EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index, while EZU tracks MSCI EMU. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.51% for EZU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.