EWMC vs. SOXQ
EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWMC returned 14.94%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWMC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
EWMC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 7.11% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 2.36% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWMC and SOXQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.65 |
The correlation between EWMC and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWMC
SOXQ
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
EWMC
SOXQ
Technology
EWMC
SOXQ
Healthcare
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Energy
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Utilities
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
EWMC
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWMC vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
EWMC
SOXQ
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWMC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.72 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 11.73 | -8.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 45.01 | -36.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWMC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 5.43 | -4.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.98 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWMC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -46.01% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -15.59% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -39.36% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -12.96% | +7.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 4.06% | -1.49% |
Volatility
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.82%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWMC | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 13.44% | -9.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 26.70% | -16.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 33.78% | -17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 36.38% | -15.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 36.38% | -14.13% |
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWMC vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWMC and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to EWMC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 14.94% for EWMC. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.
EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWMC and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer