EWMC vs. FESM
EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. EWMC is passively managed, while FESM is actively managed. Over the past year, EWMC returned 21.90% vs 46.73% for FESM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWMC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.
Performance
EWMC vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 19.64% return.
EWMC
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FESM
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 46.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWMC vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 7.11% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 8.66% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 19.64% | 17.88% | 16.22% | 12.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWMC and FESM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between EWMC and FESM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWMC vs. FESM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWMC
FESM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
EWMC
FESM
Consumer Cyclical
EWMC
FESM
Financial Services
EWMC
FESM
Technology
EWMC
FESM
Healthcare
EWMC
FESM
Real Estate
EWMC
FESM
Basic Materials
EWMC
FESM
Energy
EWMC
FESM
Consumer Defensive
EWMC
FESM
Utilities
EWMC
FESM
Communication Services
EWMC
FESM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWMC vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
EWMC
FESM
EWMC vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWMC | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.41 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 4.61 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 16.60 | -8.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWMC | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.48 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.29 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
EWMC vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and FESM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWMC | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -26.93% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -10.18% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -1.59% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -4.79% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 2.82% | -0.25% |
Volatility
EWMC vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.82%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWMC | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.64% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 13.32% | -2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 18.98% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 21.26% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 21.26% | +0.99% |
EWMC vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWMC vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than FESM's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWMC and FESM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FESM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to EWMC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs FESM's -26.93%.
On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 46.73% vs 21.90% for EWMC. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 46.73% return vs 21.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.
EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.53% for FESM.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.28% for FESM.
FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWMC and FESM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer