PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWM vs. THD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWM vs. THD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWM achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than THD's 24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EWM has underperformed THD with an annualized return of 2.59%, while THD has yielded a comparatively higher 3.47% annualized return.


EWM

1D
-2.37%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.45%
6M
6.54%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
2.59%

THD

1D
-0.75%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.17%
6M
25.06%
1Y
42.49%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
0.86%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWM vs. THD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
2.45%15.74%19.46%-3.61%-6.00%-7.40%3.12%-1.41%-6.28%24.25%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
24.17%2.36%-2.21%-12.63%1.22%1.87%-9.89%8.32%-8.25%31.45%

Correlation

The correlation between EWM and THD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2008

0.58

The correlation between EWM and THD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWM vs. THD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWM
THD

Financial Services

46.6%
11.2%

Industrials

11.1%
29.3%

Utilities

10.8%
6.7%

Basic Materials

8.9%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

6.6%
10.3%

Energy

3.9%
14.3%

Healthcare

3.8%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
4.6%

Real Estate

-

5.1%

Technology

-

0.9%

Financial Services

EWM
46.6%
THD
11.2%

Industrials

EWM
11.1%
THD
29.3%

Utilities

EWM
10.8%
THD
6.7%

Basic Materials

EWM
8.9%
THD
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWM
7.3%
THD
7.8%

Communication Services

EWM
6.6%
THD
10.3%

Energy

EWM
3.9%
THD
14.3%

Healthcare

EWM
3.8%
THD
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWM
1.1%
THD
4.6%

Real Estate

EWM

-

THD
5.1%

Technology

EWM

-

THD
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWM vs. THD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWM
EWM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

THD
THD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWM vs. THD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMTHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.49

1.88

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

2.60

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

3.25

-0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.22

9.35

-1.13

EWM vs. THD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the THD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWM and THD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMTHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.88

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.04

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.16

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.18

-0.11

Drawdowns

EWM vs. THD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWM drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than THD's maximum drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWM and THD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMTHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.19%

-64.22%

-24.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-13.12%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.31%

-34.11%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-40.24%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.81%

-49.32%

+5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-8.82%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-18.28%

-13.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

4.58%

-2.05%

Volatility

EWM vs. THD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is 4.15%, while iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that EWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMTHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

6.41%

-2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

18.28%

-7.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

22.67%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.70%

19.79%

-6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

21.58%

-5.29%

EWM vs. THD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWM vs. THD - Dividend Comparison

EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than THD's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
3.33%3.41%3.32%3.47%3.00%6.48%1.89%2.91%3.84%5.58%5.97%37.54%
THD
iShares MSCI Thailand ETF
2.71%3.36%3.15%2.92%2.41%3.16%2.31%2.42%2.57%2.16%2.61%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWM and THD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to EWM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWM dropped -89.19% vs THD's -64.22%.

On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 2.59% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THD.

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.71% for THD.

EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index, while THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWM and 0.59% for THD.

THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWM and THD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer