EWL vs. LVHI
EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWL returned 6.50%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for LVHI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
EWL vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 13.78% return.
EWL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 31.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
EWL vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 4.60% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWL and LVHI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EWL and LVHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWL vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWL
LVHI
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
EWL
LVHI
Financial Services
EWL
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
EWL
LVHI
Industrials
EWL
LVHI
Basic Materials
EWL
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
EWL
LVHI
Communication Services
EWL
LVHI
Real Estate
EWL
LVHI
Technology
EWL
LVHI
Utilities
EWL
LVHI
Energy
EWL
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWL vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
EWL
LVHI
EWL vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWL | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.63 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 5.23 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 21.61 | -18.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWL vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWL | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.62% | -32.31% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -6.08% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -11.99% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -11.99% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | 0.00% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -3.51% | -7.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 1.48% | +2.74% |
Volatility
EWL vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWL | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.12% | 2.78% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 7.72% | +4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.09% | 9.60% | +6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 11.08% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 13.75% | +2.72% |
EWL vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWL vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWL and LVHI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWL has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 6.50% for EWL. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 1.63% for EWL.
EWL is categorized as Europe Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWL and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer