PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWL vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWL vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 9.27%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


EWL

1D
-1.39%
1M
0.96%
YTD
1.57%
6M
4.87%
1Y
12.76%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.27%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWL vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.57%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWL and IVV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.62

The correlation between EWL and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWL vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWL
IVV

Healthcare

38.8%
8.5%

Financial Services

18.6%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

14.9%
4.9%

Industrials

12.0%
8.3%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
10.1%

Communication Services

1.3%
11.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Technology

0.9%
35.6%

Utilities

0.4%
2.4%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

EWL
38.8%
IVV
8.5%

Financial Services

EWL
18.6%
IVV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

EWL
14.9%
IVV
4.9%

Industrials

EWL
12.0%
IVV
8.3%

Basic Materials

EWL
6.6%
IVV
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWL
5.4%
IVV
10.1%

Communication Services

EWL
1.3%
IVV
11.2%

Real Estate

EWL
0.9%
IVV
1.9%

Technology

EWL
0.9%
IVV
35.6%

Utilities

EWL
0.4%
IVV
2.4%

Energy

EWL

-

IVV
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWL vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWL vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWLIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

2.39

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

3.25

-2.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.17

-2.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.10

14.71

-11.61

EWL vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWL and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWLIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.39

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.83

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.45

-0.11

Drawdowns

EWL vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWLIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.62%

-55.25%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.48%

-8.89%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-18.75%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.99%

-24.53%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.99%

-33.90%

+4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.42%

-0.76%

-5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-10.78%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

1.91%

+2.22%

Volatility

EWL vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWLIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

2.87%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

8.90%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

11.80%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

16.88%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

18.05%

-1.58%

EWL vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWL vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.68%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWL and IVV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWL has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 9.27% for EWL. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.

EWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EWL is categorized as Europe Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWL and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer