EWL vs. DBEU
EWL (iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF) and DBEU (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund) are both Europe Equities funds - EWL tracks the MSCI Switzerland Index while DBEU tracks the MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWL returned 10.25%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for DBEU. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBEU.
Performance
EWL vs. DBEU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than DBEU's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed DBEU with an annualized return of 10.25%, while DBEU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.00% annualized return.
EWL
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 4.35%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 17.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
DBEU
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
EWL vs. DBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 4.35% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
DBEU Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund | 10.66% | 22.18% | 9.17% | 17.43% | -6.25% | 23.99% | -1.42% | 27.32% | -8.49% | 14.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWL and DBEU is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.73 |
The correlation between EWL and DBEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWL vs. DBEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWL
DBEU
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Healthcare
EWL
DBEU
Financial Services
EWL
DBEU
Consumer Defensive
EWL
DBEU
Industrials
EWL
DBEU
Consumer Cyclical
EWL
DBEU
Basic Materials
EWL
DBEU
Communication Services
EWL
DBEU
Technology
EWL
DBEU
Real Estate
EWL
DBEU
Utilities
EWL
DBEU
Energy
EWL
-
DBEU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWL vs. DBEU — Risk / Return Rank
EWL
DBEU
EWL vs. DBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWL | DBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.40 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 9.76 | -5.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWL vs. DBEU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, which is greater than DBEU's maximum drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and DBEU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWL | DBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.62% | -34.50% | -17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -9.81% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -15.35% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -17.67% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.99% | -34.50% | +5.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -0.79% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.08% | -4.43% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 2.40% | +1.83% |
Volatility
EWL vs. DBEU - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund (DBEU) at 4.00%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWL | DBEU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 4.00% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 10.95% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 13.02% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 14.38% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 16.27% | +0.03% |
EWL vs. DBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEU's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWL vs. DBEU - Dividend Comparison
EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than DBEU's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEU Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity Fund | 1.43% | 4.55% | 0.07% | 3.64% | 1.96% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 2.77% | 3.55% | 2.28% | 9.92% | 5.50% |
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.77% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWL and DBEU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWL has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DBEU (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWL dropped -51.62% vs DBEU's -34.50%.
On 10-year performance, DBEU leads with 12.00% vs 10.25% for EWL. On fees, DBEU is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBEU has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEU has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEU is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.
EWL has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.43% for DBEU.
EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index, while DBEU tracks MSCI Europe US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWL and 0.45% for DBEU.
DBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWL and DBEU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer