PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWK vs. EWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWK vs. EWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWK achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than EWG's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWK has underperformed EWG with an annualized return of 6.17%, while EWG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.59% annualized return.


EWK

1D
-0.90%
1M
4.22%
YTD
9.09%
6M
10.00%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
6.17%

EWG

1D
-1.84%
1M
3.11%
YTD
0.64%
6M
4.44%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWK vs. EWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWK
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF
9.09%35.38%0.14%7.47%-13.98%12.84%0.04%25.92%-20.40%23.70%
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
0.64%35.79%9.79%23.35%-22.27%5.84%10.09%19.15%-21.40%27.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EWK and EWG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996

0.69

The correlation between EWK and EWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWK vs. EWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWK
EWG

Healthcare

26.1%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

25.1%
1.4%

Financial Services

16.5%
21.6%

Real Estate

10.3%
1.3%

Industrials

7.7%
30.3%

Basic Materials

5.0%
5.8%

Utilities

3.0%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%
8.2%

Technology

1.7%
13.8%

Communication Services

1.4%
6.6%

Energy

1.1%

-

Healthcare

EWK
26.1%
EWG
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWK
25.1%
EWG
1.4%

Financial Services

EWK
16.5%
EWG
21.6%

Real Estate

EWK
10.3%
EWG
1.3%

Industrials

EWK
7.7%
EWG
30.3%

Basic Materials

EWK
5.0%
EWG
5.8%

Utilities

EWK
3.0%
EWG
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWK
2.0%
EWG
8.2%

Technology

EWK
1.7%
EWG
13.8%

Communication Services

EWK
1.4%
EWG
6.6%

Energy

EWK
1.1%
EWG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWK vs. EWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWK
EWK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

EWG
EWG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWK vs. EWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWKEWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.05

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

0.22

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.28

0.66

+4.62

EWK vs. EWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the EWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWK and EWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWKEWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

0.19

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.29

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.25

+0.01

Drawdowns

EWK vs. EWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWK drawdown since its inception was -74.10%, which is greater than EWG's maximum drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWK and EWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWKEWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.10%

-67.57%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-14.54%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-15.81%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.22%

-43.44%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.80%

-46.80%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-4.02%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.54%

-19.20%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

4.89%

-0.59%

Volatility

EWK vs. EWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) is 5.54%, while iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that EWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWKEWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

6.49%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

14.18%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

17.28%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

20.48%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

21.11%

-2.05%

EWK vs. EWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWK and EWG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

EWK vs. EWG - Dividend Comparison

EWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, which matches EWG's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWG
iShares MSCI Germany ETF
1.59%1.60%2.38%2.56%3.24%2.70%1.67%2.51%2.93%2.06%2.35%1.93%
EWK
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF
1.59%1.73%3.25%2.09%2.58%3.64%1.66%2.77%2.78%2.91%1.75%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWK and EWG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EWK (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWK dropped -74.10% vs EWG's -67.57%.

On 10-year performance, EWG leads with 7.59% vs 6.17% for EWK. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWK has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWG has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWK and EWG have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

EWK and EWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.59%.

EWK tracks MSCI Belgium Investable Market Index, while EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index.

EWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWK and EWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer