EWK vs. EWG
EWK (iShares MSCI Belgium ETF) and EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EWK tracks the MSCI Belgium Investable Market Index while EWG tracks the MSCI Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWK returned 6.17%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for EWG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWK vs. EWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWK achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than EWG's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWK has underperformed EWG with an annualized return of 6.17%, while EWG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.59% annualized return.
EWK
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
EWG
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
EWK vs. EWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWK iShares MSCI Belgium ETF | 9.09% | 35.38% | 0.14% | 7.47% | -13.98% | 12.84% | 0.04% | 25.92% | -20.40% | 23.70% |
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 0.64% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWK and EWG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996 | 0.69 |
The correlation between EWK and EWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWK vs. EWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWK
EWG
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
-
Healthcare
EWK
EWG
Consumer Defensive
EWK
EWG
Financial Services
EWK
EWG
Real Estate
EWK
EWG
Industrials
EWK
EWG
Basic Materials
EWK
EWG
Utilities
EWK
EWG
Consumer Cyclical
EWK
EWG
Technology
EWK
EWG
Communication Services
EWK
EWG
Energy
EWK
EWG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWK vs. EWG — Risk / Return Rank
EWK
EWG
EWK vs. EWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWK | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.05 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 0.22 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 0.66 | +4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWK | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.19 | +1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.29 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.25 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EWK vs. EWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWK drawdown since its inception was -74.10%, which is greater than EWG's maximum drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWK and EWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWK | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.10% | -67.57% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.47% | -14.54% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -15.81% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.22% | -43.44% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.80% | -46.80% | +4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -4.02% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.54% | -19.20% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 4.89% | -0.59% |
Volatility
EWK vs. EWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) is 5.54%, while iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that EWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWK | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.49% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 14.18% | -1.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 17.28% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 20.48% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 21.11% | -2.05% |
EWK vs. EWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWK and EWG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWK vs. EWG - Dividend Comparison
EWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, which matches EWG's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
EWK iShares MSCI Belgium ETF | 1.59% | 1.73% | 3.25% | 2.09% | 2.58% | 3.64% | 1.66% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.91% | 1.75% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWK and EWG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EWK (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWK dropped -74.10% vs EWG's -67.57%.
On 10-year performance, EWG leads with 7.59% vs 6.17% for EWK. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWK has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWG has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 6.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWK and EWG have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWK and EWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.59%.
EWK tracks MSCI Belgium Investable Market Index, while EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index.
EWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWK and EWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer