PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWHYX vs. TMNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
0.37%3.59%5.42%7.74%-11.72%0.21%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
-0.24%2.56%3.92%6.85%-3.12%0.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWHYX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than TMNIX's -0.24% return.


EWHYX

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.37%
6M
2.18%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
10Y*

TMNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWHYX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TMNIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EWHYX vs. TMNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWHYX
EWHYX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EWHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TMNIX
TMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX) and Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWHYXTMNIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.67

-1.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.84

2.48

-1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

1.80

-1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.85

6.33

-4.48

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWHYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the TMNIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWHYX and TMNIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWHYXTMNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.67

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.35

-1.16

Correlation

The correlation between EWHYX and TMNIX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Dividend Comparison

EWHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than TMNIX's 3.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EWHYX
Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W
4.73%5.06%4.92%3.97%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMNIX
Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund
3.07%2.79%3.31%3.40%0.36%4.39%2.36%3.69%1.10%

Drawdowns

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWHYX drawdown since its inception was -16.52%, which is greater than TMNIX's maximum drawdown of -4.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWHYX and TMNIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EWHYXTMNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.52%

-4.63%

-11.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-2.21%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.18%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-1.48%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.63%

+1.90%

Volatility

EWHYX vs. TMNIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund Class W (EWHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund (TMNIX) at 1.07%. This indicates that EWHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EWHYXTMNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.07%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

1.69%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.62%

2.34%

+4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.27%

3.00%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

2.68%

+2.59%