EWD vs. SLV
EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EWD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Sweden Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWD returned 9.23%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EWD vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.23%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
EWD
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
EWD vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 4.90% | 36.55% | -3.90% | 25.07% | -27.84% | 22.84% | 22.27% | 21.74% | -12.78% | 21.86% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWD and SLV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.29 |
EWD vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWD
SLV
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
EWD
SLV
-
Financial Services
EWD
SLV
-
Communication Services
EWD
SLV
-
Technology
EWD
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EWD
SLV
Consumer Cyclical
EWD
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EWD
SLV
-
Healthcare
EWD
SLV
-
Real Estate
EWD
SLV
-
Energy
EWD
-
SLV
-
Utilities
EWD
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWD vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EWD
SLV
EWD vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWD | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.35 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.62 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 5.64 | -1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWD | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.89 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.49 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.25 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
EWD vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWD | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.40% | -76.28% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -42.45% | +27.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | -42.45% | +24.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.33% | -42.45% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -42.81% | +0.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -37.30% | +31.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -44.67% | +25.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 19.67% | -15.46% |
Volatility
EWD vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) is 7.26%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that EWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWD | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 16.30% | -9.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 58.31% | -41.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 58.90% | -39.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 36.15% | -12.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 31.84% | -8.34% |
EWD vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWD vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 3.12% | 3.27% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 3.68% | 5.46% | 0.98% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 3.23% | 3.91% | 4.08% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWD and SLV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to EWD (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 9.23% for EWD. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWD has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.
EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EWD is categorized as Europe Equities, while SLV is Silver. EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWD and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer