EWD vs. IBIT
EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Sweden Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EWD returned 18.29% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
EWD vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
EWD
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWD vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 4.90% | 36.55% | 0.50% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWD and IBIT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWD vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
EWD
IBIT
EWD vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWD | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.86 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.79 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | -1.36 | +5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWD | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | -0.89 | +1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
EWD vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWD | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.40% | -49.36% | -26.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -49.36% | +34.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -48.10% | +42.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.22% | -16.02% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.21% | 28.44% | -24.23% |
Volatility
EWD vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) is 7.26%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that EWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWD | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 9.50% | -2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.45% | 34.44% | -17.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 43.73% | -23.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 50.19% | -26.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 50.19% | -26.69% |
EWD vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWD vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF | 3.12% | 3.27% | 1.77% | 2.41% | 3.68% | 5.46% | 0.98% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 3.23% | 3.91% | 4.08% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWD and IBIT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to EWD (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, EWD leads with 18.29% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EWD has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EWD has performed better with a 18.29% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.
EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
EWD is categorized as Europe Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.25% for IBIT.
EWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWD and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer