EWD vs. EDEN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EWD tracks the MSCI Sweden Index while EDEN tracks the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWD returned 9.31%/yr vs 8.21%/yr for EDEN. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDEN.

Performance

EWD vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's -3.46% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 9.31%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.

EWD

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 6.28%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: 4.52%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

EDEN

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.46%
• 6M: 0.04%
• 1Y: -1.91%
• 3Y*: 3.27%
• 5Y*: 2.10%
• 10Y*: 8.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWD vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF	6.28%	36.55%	-3.90%	25.07%	-27.84%	22.84%	22.27%	21.74%	-12.78%	21.86%
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	-3.46%	10.58%	-3.94%	17.99%	-11.47%	14.81%	42.56%	24.37%	-14.43%	35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between EWD and EDEN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012	0.67

The correlation between EWD and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWD vs. EDEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWD	EDEN
Industrials	46.5%	31.3%
Financial Services	24.1%	16.2%
Communication Services	12.3%	-
Technology	7.2%	1.1%
Basic Materials	3.2%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	2.4%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	4.9%
Healthcare	1.2%	34.8%
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Energy	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

EWD vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWD

EWD Risk / Return Rank: 27
EWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EWD Martin Ratio Rank: 30

EDEN

EDEN Risk / Return Rank: 8
EDEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Omega Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EDEN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWD vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWD	EDEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	-0.09	+1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	0.02	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.00	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	-0.09	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.26	-0.19	+4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWD vs. EDEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the EDEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWD and EDEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWD	EDEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	-0.09	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.10	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.42	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.64	-0.37

Drawdowns

EWD vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and EDEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWD	EDEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.40%	-36.61%	-38.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.49%	-21.17%	+6.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.84%	-29.31%	+11.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.33%	-36.61%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.33%	-36.61%	-5.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-13.92%	+9.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.22%	-7.36%	-11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	10.07%	-5.85%

Volatility

EWD vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) at 4.99%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWD	EDEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.28%	4.99%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.50%	15.69%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.76%	20.90%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.93%	20.22%	+3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.50%	19.44%	+4.06%

EWD vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWD vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison

EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than EDEN's 2.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF	2.89%	2.79%	1.50%	1.92%	1.47%	0.74%	0.42%	2.36%	2.01%	2.03%	1.28%	1.46%
EWD iShares MSCI Sweden ETF	3.08%	3.27%	1.77%	2.41%	3.68%	5.46%	0.98%	4.15%	5.17%	3.23%	3.91%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWD and EDEN in my portfolio?

EWD and EDEN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWD or EDEN?

EWD has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to EDEN (4.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs EDEN's -36.61%.

Which ETF is better, EWD or EDEN?

On 10-year performance, EWD leads with 9.31% vs 8.21% for EDEN. On fees, EDEN is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EDEN has been the lower-risk option at 4.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWD or EDEN?

Over the 10-year period, EWD has performed better with a 9.31% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWD or EDEN?

EDEN is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWD or EDEN?

EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.89% for EDEN.

What is the main difference between EWD and EDEN?

EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while EDEN tracks MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.53% for EDEN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.