PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWD vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWD vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EWD (iShares MSCI Sweden ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWD is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Sweden Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWD returned 9.98%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

EWD vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWD achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, EWD has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 9.98%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.

EWD

1D
-2.77%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.47%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*
9.98%

ACWI

1D
-2.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
9.86%
6M
9.11%
1Y
25.60%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWD vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF		1.43%36.55%-3.90%25.07%-27.84%22.84%22.27%21.74%-12.78%21.86%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		9.86%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EWD and ACWI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2008

0.81

The correlation between EWD and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWD vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWD
ACWI

Industrials

45.3%
10.3%

Financial Services

24.1%
15.9%

Communication Services

13.2%
8.0%

Technology

7.5%
33.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
4.7%

Healthcare

1.2%
7.7%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.6%

Energy

-

3.6%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Industrials

EWD
45.3%
ACWI
10.3%

Financial Services

EWD
24.1%
ACWI
15.9%

Communication Services

EWD
13.2%
ACWI
8.0%

Technology

EWD
7.5%
ACWI
33.0%

Basic Materials

EWD
3.1%
ACWI
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWD
2.4%
ACWI
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWD
2.2%
ACWI
4.7%

Healthcare

EWD
1.2%
ACWI
7.7%

Real Estate

EWD
1.1%
ACWI
1.6%

Energy

EWD

-

ACWI
3.6%

Utilities

EWD

-

ACWI
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Sweden ETF

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with EWD:
EWD vs. EWGEWD vs. NORWEWD vs. EWCEWD vs. EWNEWD vs. VOOEWD vs. OMXS.LEWD vs. QQQ
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI

Return for Risk

EWD vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EWD
EWD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWD vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EWDACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.74
1.89

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.16
2.60

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.64

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

11.51

-8.12

EWD vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWD and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWD vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWD drawdown since its inception was -75.40%, which is greater than ACWI's maximum drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWD and ACWI.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWDACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.40%

-56.00%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.49%

-9.73%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.84%

-16.55%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.33%

-26.42%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-33.53%

-8.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-2.83%

-5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.20%

-8.59%

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

2.23%

+2.21%

Volatility

EWD vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Sweden ETF (EWD) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 5.57%. This indicates that EWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWDACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

5.57%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.20%

11.38%

+5.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.34%

13.64%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

16.20%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

17.08%

+6.15%

EWD vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWD vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

EWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than ACWI's 1.45% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.45%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
EWD
iShares MSCI Sweden ETF		3.68%3.27%1.77%2.41%3.68%5.46%0.98%4.15%5.17%3.23%3.91%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWD and ACWI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWD has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to ACWI (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWD dropped -75.40% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 13.09% vs 9.98% for EWD. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 13.09% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EWD.

EWD has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.45% for ACWI.

EWD is categorized as Europe Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. EWD tracks MSCI Sweden Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EWD and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWD and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer