PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVYM vs. EVLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVYM vs. EVLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVYM achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than EVLN's 1.50% return.


EVYM

1D
0.13%
1M
1.59%
YTD
3.83%
6M
4.13%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVLN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.50%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVYM vs. EVLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVYM and EVLN is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVYM vs. EVLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLN
EVLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EVLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLN Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVYM vs. EVLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVYMEVLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.52

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.63

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

8.57

+5.19

EVYM vs. EVLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the EVLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVYM and EVLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVYM vs. EVLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVYM drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, which is greater than EVLN's maximum drawdown of -2.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVYM and EVLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVYMEVLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-2.78%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-1.77%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.10%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-0.21%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

0.54%

+0.19%

Volatility

EVYM vs. EVLN - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF (EVLN) at 0.41%. This indicates that EVYM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVYMEVLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.41%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

1.64%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

1.87%

+1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.41%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

2.41%

+3.59%

EVYM vs. EVLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVYM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVYM vs. EVLN - Dividend Comparison

EVYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than EVLN's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EVLN
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF
6.91%7.28%6.41%
EVYM
Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF
4.76%3.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVYM and EVLN have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVYM has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to EVLN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVYM dropped -6.08% vs EVLN's -2.78%.

On 1-year performance, EVYM leads with 10.04% vs 4.63% for EVLN. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVYM has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 4.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EVLN.

EVLN has the higher dividend yield at 6.91%, compared with 4.76% for EVYM.

EVYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while EVLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EVYM and 0.60% for EVLN.

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVYM and EVLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer