EVYM vs. DCMT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EVYM (Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF) and DCMT (DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while DCMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVYM returned 9.11% vs 32.24% for DCMT. Their -0.23 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EVYM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DCMT.

Performance

EVYM vs. DCMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVYM achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than DCMT's 27.72% return.

EVYM

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -2.00%
• 6M: 2.22%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 1Y: 9.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.58%

DCMT

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 8.55%
• 6M: 17.61%
• YTD: 27.72%
• 1Y: 32.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	$337.61K	$272.59K	$201.81K
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	$310.70K	$294.42K	$276.58K

EVYM vs. DCMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	2.72%	3.75%
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	27.72%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EVYM and DCMT is -0.30, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

EVYM vs. DCMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVYM

EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 93
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

DCMT

DCMT Risk / Return Rank: 63
DCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
DCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVYM vs. DCMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVYM	DCMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.68	1.63	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	2.24	+1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.28	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.60	1.94	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.70	6.51	+8.19

EVYM vs. DCMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the DCMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVYM and DCMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVYM vs. DCMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVYM drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, smaller than the maximum DCMT drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVYM and DCMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVYM	DCMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-15.96%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-15.96%	+13.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.00%	-8.32%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-3.61%	+2.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	4.75%	-4.07%

Volatility

EVYM vs. DCMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) is 1.11%, while DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that EVYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVYM	DCMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	5.43%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	17.04%	-14.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	19.04%	-15.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.87%	16.04%	-10.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.87%	16.04%	-10.17%

EVYM vs. DCMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVYM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DCMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVYM vs. DCMT - Dividend Comparison

EVYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than DCMT's 2.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DCMT DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF	2.88%	3.67%	1.59%
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	4.89%	3.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVYM and DCMT in my portfolio?

EVYM and DCMT have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVYM or DCMT?

DCMT has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to EVYM (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVYM dropped -6.08% vs DCMT's -15.96%.

Which ETF is better, EVYM or DCMT?

On 1-year performance, DCMT leads with 32.24% vs 9.11% for EVYM. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVYM or DCMT?

Over the 1-year period, DCMT has performed better with a 32.24% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVYM or DCMT?

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DCMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVYM or DCMT?

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 2.88% for DCMT.

What is the main difference between EVYM and DCMT?

EVYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while DCMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EVYM and 0.66% for DCMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.