EVX vs. RIFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) and RIFR (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. EVX is passively managed, while RIFR is actively managed. Over the past year, EVX returned 5.22% vs 12.80% for RIFR. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for RIFR.

Performance

EVX vs. RIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than RIFR's 8.62% return.

EVX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 5.22%
• 3Y*: 10.41%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

RIFR

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 8.08%
• 1Y: 12.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVX vs. RIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF	2.99%	6.03%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	8.62%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EVX and RIFR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	0.55

The correlation between EVX and RIFR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVX vs. RIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVX

EVX Risk / Return Rank: 14
EVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
EVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EVX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
EVX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

RIFR

RIFR Risk / Return Rank: 36
RIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVX vs. RIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVX	RIFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.39	1.22	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.73	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.22	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	1.89	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.15	6.07	-4.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVX vs. RIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the RIFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVX and RIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVX	RIFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39	1.22	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.47	-1.04

Drawdowns

EVX vs. RIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, which is greater than RIFR's maximum drawdown of -6.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and RIFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVX	RIFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.91%	-6.80%	-49.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.85%	-6.80%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.96%	-4.18%	-2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-1.61%	-7.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.56%	2.12%	+2.44%

Volatility

EVX vs. RIFR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF (RIFR) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVX	RIFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.52%	3.50%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.90%	8.52%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	10.51%	+3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	10.69%	+6.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.25%	10.69%	+9.56%

EVX vs. RIFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than RIFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVX vs. RIFR - Dividend Comparison

EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than RIFR's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF	0.18%	0.19%	0.46%	0.95%	0.41%	0.24%	0.32%	0.38%	0.38%	0.89%	0.70%	1.16%
RIFR Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF	0.90%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVX and RIFR in my portfolio?

EVX and RIFR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVX or RIFR?

EVX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to RIFR (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs RIFR's -6.80%.

Which ETF is better, EVX or RIFR?

On 1-year performance, RIFR leads with 12.80% vs 5.22% for EVX. On fees, EVX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVX or RIFR?

Over the 1-year period, RIFR has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVX or RIFR?

EVX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RIFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVX or RIFR?

RIFR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.

What is the main difference between EVX and RIFR?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EVX and 0.59% for RIFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.