EVVCX vs. DGTSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EVVCX (E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, EVVCX returned 2.08%/yr vs 5.26%/yr for DGTSX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVVCX charges 1.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.

Performance

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund (EVVCX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EVVCX having a 4.26% return and DGTSX slightly higher at 4.30%.

EVVCX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 10.25%
• 3Y*: 5.32%
• 5Y*: 2.08%
• 10Y*: —

DGTSX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 6M: 4.61%
• 1Y: 10.24%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: 5.26%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EVVCX E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund	4.26%	8.57%	0.37%	4.70%	-7.06%	-0.54%	7.69%	9.79%	-3.20%	6.36%
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.30%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-1.85%	5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EVVCX and DGTSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.70

The correlation between EVVCX and DGTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EVVCX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVVCX

EVVCX Risk / Return Rank: 69
EVVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EVVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EVVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EVVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EVVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund (EVVCX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVVCX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	3.07	-0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	4.63	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.64	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.94	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.15	17.59	-4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVVCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVVCX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVVCX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	3.07	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.89	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.94	-0.32

Drawdowns

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVVCX drawdown since its inception was -15.70%, smaller than the maximum DGTSX drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVVCX and DGTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVVCX	DGTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.70%	-16.71%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.28%	-2.64%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.10%	-7.46%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.41%	-11.26%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-1.65%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.59%	+0.20%

Volatility

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund (EVVCX) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.14%. This indicates that EVVCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVVCX	DGTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	1.14%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.64%	2.73%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	3.39%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.57%	5.96%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.07%	5.23%	-0.16%

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVVCX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVVCX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

EVVCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.70%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
EVVCX E-Valuator Very Conservative (0%-15%) RMS Fund	3.11%	3.24%	1.57%	4.02%	2.00%	6.18%	0.94%	2.36%	3.81%	3.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVVCX and DGTSX in my portfolio?

EVVCX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVVCX or DGTSX?

EVVCX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to DGTSX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVVCX dropped -15.70% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.