EVV vs. CRDSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EVV (Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund) and CRDSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, EVV returned 8.30%/yr vs 4.88%/yr for CRDSX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EVV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRDSX.

Performance

EVV vs. CRDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund (EVV) and Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVV achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly lower than CRDSX's 1.09% return.

EVV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.45%
• 6M: -3.53%
• YTD: -3.21%
• 1Y: -0.82%
• 3Y*: 8.30%
• 5Y*: 2.31%
• 10Y*: 5.10%
• ALL TIME*: 5.56%

CRDSX

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 1Y: 3.00%
• 3Y*: 4.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRDSX Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
EVV Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund	$3.59M	$3.99M	$3.68M

EVV vs. CRDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVV Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund	-3.21%	10.72%	12.22%	13.33%	-15.45%
CRDSX Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund	1.09%	5.51%	4.81%	5.02%	-2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between EVV and CRDSX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022	0.21

Return for Risk

EVV vs. CRDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EVV

EVV Risk / Return Rank: 3
EVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EVV Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EVV Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CRDSX

CRDSX Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CRDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CRDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CRDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CRDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EVV vs. CRDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund (EVV) and Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVV	CRDSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	2.40	-2.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	3.81	-4.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.57	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	3.73	-3.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	14.54	-15.04

EVV vs. CRDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVV Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the CRDSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVV and CRDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVV vs. CRDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVV drawdown since its inception was -51.37%, which is greater than CRDSX's maximum drawdown of -4.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVV and CRDSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVV	CRDSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.37%	-4.22%	-47.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-0.92%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.53%	-0.92%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.00%	0.00%	-5.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-0.81%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	0.24%	+2.76%

Volatility

EVV vs. CRDSX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund (EVV) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (CRDSX) at 0.32%. This indicates that EVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVV	CRDSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	0.32%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	1.10%	+6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.93%	1.44%	+7.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	2.01%	+10.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	2.01%	+13.38%

EVV vs. CRDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CRDSX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVV vs. CRDSX - Dividend Comparison

EVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.55%, more than CRDSX's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRDSX Catholic Responsible Investments Short Duration Bond Fund	4.24%	4.32%	4.38%	3.50%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EVV Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund	9.55%	8.86%	9.78%	10.43%	12.78%	9.16%	9.58%	6.42%	8.44%	7.22%	8.46%	9.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVV and CRDSX in my portfolio?

EVV and CRDSX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVV or CRDSX?

EVV has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to CRDSX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVV dropped -51.37% vs CRDSX's -4.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRDSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.