EVT vs. AFNIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX).
EVT is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003. AFNIX is managed by AAM. It was launched on Jul 5, 2012.
Performance
EVT vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVT vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVT Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 0.53% | 13.79% | 17.34% | 5.78% | -17.33% | 33.94% | 1.72% | 44.71% | -11.92% | 21.80% |
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 1.74% | 11.36% | 16.23% | 6.59% | -8.77% | 25.23% | 6.60% | 25.71% | -1.98% | 19.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVT achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than AFNIX's 1.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EVT having a 10.85% annualized return and AFNIX not far behind at 10.47%.
EVT
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 15.98%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
AFNIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 12.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVT vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVT has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVT vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank
EVT
AFNIX
EVT vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVT | AFNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.26 | 6.34 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVT | AFNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.61 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.65 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.69 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVT and AFNIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EVT vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison
EVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, less than AFNIX's 31.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVT Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 7.95% | 7.84% | 8.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 5.65% | 7.97% | 6.82% | 9.16% | 6.85% | 8.47% | 7.49% |
AFNIX AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I | 31.45% | 14.13% | 6.88% | 3.43% | 4.61% | 1.78% | 1.75% | 2.13% | 2.04% | 1.72% | 1.79% | 2.66% |
Drawdowns
EVT vs. AFNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVT drawdown since its inception was -74.01%, which is greater than AFNIX's maximum drawdown of -35.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVT and AFNIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVT | AFNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.01% | -35.60% | -38.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.02% | -10.43% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.23% | -19.57% | -8.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.03% | -35.60% | -16.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.21% | -5.60% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.21% | -3.54% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.15% | +0.85% |
Volatility
EVT vs. AFNIX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX) at 3.06%. This indicates that EVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVT | AFNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 3.06% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | 6.63% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 13.61% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 13.89% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 16.25% | +4.34% |